Pages

Monday, November 8, 2010

A MUST SEE!!!

This Doctor's study is about to change EVERYTHING!!!
Already, cases being presented in the Federal Vaccine Court are WINNING! In other words, the government is FINALLY admitting that YES, PERMANENT DAMAGE IS CAUSED BY CERTAIN VACCINES!!!


CLICK HERE: Are Vaccines used on children causing brain damage?

Polio Vaccine

According to Dr. Robert W. Sears, a board-certified pediatrician and author of several books, including my favorite: "The Vaccine Book", the side effect profile of the polio vaccine "is one of the safest of all vaccines."
In addition, vaccination against polio has eradicated polio from the US, but not worldwide.
Polio is a serious disease with no treatment.
We feel as though, since the benefits outweigh the risks of this vaccine, we have opted to administer the polio vaccine.

Pharmaceutical Fast Facts

  1. ScienceDaily (Jan. 7, 2008) — A new study by two York University researchers estimates the U.S. pharmaceutical industry spends almost twice as much on promotion as it does on research and development, contrary to the industry’s claim. The researchers’ estimate is based on the systematic collection of data directly from the industry and doctors during 2004, which shows the U.S. pharmaceutical industry spent 24.4% of the sales dollar on promotion, versus 13.4% for research and development, as a percentage of US domestic sales of US$235.4 billion.  http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/01/080105140107.htm
  2. "Science no longer prevails in medicine. Instead, modern medicine has been democratized. Drug approval is a simple matter of 51 percent telling the other 49 percent that a prescription drug is safe and necessary. The outcome: Deadly drugs are approved for use among misinformed medical doctors and patients...DTC advertising forges a belief among the general public which asserts that drugs—not lifestyle habits and nutrition— confer health and longevity. And although, in reality, medicine is only necessary for sick people in times of emergency, DTC advertising has been wildly successful in convincing people that being healthy requires a lifetime of prescription drug use. While it’s true that the advertising usually mentions the potential side effects of drugs, doctors tend to discount them. They simply regurgitate the pharmaceutical-company line that "the benefits of a drug outweigh the risks." -Shane Ellison-Rouge Chemist turned consumer health advocate. He has been quoted by USA Today, Shape, Woman’s World, as well as Women’s Health and has served as guest speaker for large corporations like BP and appeared on Fox and NBC as a natural medicine advocate.  

Sunday, November 7, 2010

Prophylactic Eye Drops

This article, reproduced in entirety was found on Associated Content


Most newborns in the United States, whether delivered by midwife or obstetrician, will receive prophylactic eye ointment shortly after birth. Many parents, however, are opting not to have this treatment administered to their
newborns. While prophylactic eye ointment is required by law in many areas, parents are free to forbid the treatment (and most other medical interventions) if they so choose.

Benefits

If the mother has been exposed to Chlamydia, syphilis, or gonorrhea, or if her status is unknown, prophylactic eye drops may be well-advised. The eye ointment can prevent infection from these bacteria that may be present in the birth canal. Prophylactic eye drops can also prevent infection from these and other germs in the air and on caretakers' hands. These infections can cause blindness in newborns, so if the newborn is at risk for 

exposure to these bacteria, prophylactic eye drops should be administered. It is important to note that there is some debate as to whether the erythromycin ointment actually prevents these infections(http://www.drjaygordon.com/development/pediatricks/eyecare.asp) but findings are inconclusive. It is also important to note that the bacteria have been found in the eyes of newborns delivered by c-section. As these babies never passed through the birth canal, the bacteria may be transmitted through the air, or on the hands of nurses, doctors, and other caregivers.

Risks

Prophylactic eye drops do carry some side effects, but these side effects tend to be minor. Clogged tear ducts are the most common complaint, along with minor eye irritation and redness. (Silver nitrate drops were once
commonly used, but this treatment tended to cause severe eye irritation including redness and burning. Therefore, erythromycin drops are now more commonly used.) Prophylactic eye ointment can also temporarily blur vision, and many experts speculate that this may interfere with infant/mother bonding during the crucial first moments after birth. To lessen this impact, it may be advisable to postpone eye ointment for at least the first hour after birth, so that the baby may see and bond with the mother during that time.
In instances where the mother has no sexually transmitted diseases and the risk of exposure is low, prophylactic eye ointment may be unnecessary. If you are unsure and would like to determine your risk, simple tests can determine whether or not there are any dangerous bacteria present in the birth canal. Talk with your doctor to determine whether your newborn should receive the treatment at birth. Remember that as with most medical procedures, prophylactic eye drops are elective and may be refused if the parents wish. 

RESOURCES:

http://www.keepkidshealthy.com/newborn/newbornproblems/eyeproblems.html

http://www.kir.org/babycontent/babycontent.htm

http://www.hpakids.org/holistic-health/articles/102/1/Newborn-Care

http://www.drjaygordon.com/development/pediatricks/eyecare.asp

http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00000120;jsessionid=14B4175FD085E3EA24A3F1CF79E05993?order=9

Friday, November 5, 2010

Food for thought...CHALLENGE

Food for thought: If you have a child that has been vaccinated, I dare you to take this challenge: Off the top of your head can you name the 36 vaccinations that were given to your child? 


Can you name 24 of them?


How about 18 of them? That's HALF of what was administered.


Next, can you name ONE risk factor associated with each of those 36? 


These drugs were administered to your child so you must know the name, benefits & risks of each, right? Or did you just "do what the doctor said?"

Co-sleeping

YUP! The baby will sleep with us! We have registered for a co-sleeper which will allow the baby to sleep in our room attached to our bed, but not IN our bed, for approximately 12-15 months. Im not worried about privacy, again, that is a "me comfort" that I am more than happy to forgo for the sake of my child. The baby will sleep in his/her crib in the nursery during nap time because in addition to the advantages of co-sleeping, we also believe in the benefits of self-soothing and experiencing going to sleep and waking up in an alternative environment. After all, there will be times when we are on vacation, or spending the weekend with friends, or letting grandma babysit and we want the baby/child to be comfortable with different environments.
As far as the co-sleeping, not only will the experience promote bonding, reduce the risk of postpartum depression and simply be more convenient while I breast feed, but studies show that there are many psychological advantages as well!
* Heron's (1) recent cross-sectional study of middle class English children shows that amongst the children who "never" slept in their parents bed there was a trend to be harder to control, less happy, exhibit a greater number of tantrums. Moreover, he found that those children who never were permitted to bed-share were actually more fearful than children who always slept in their parents bed, for all of the night (1).
* In a survey of adult college age subjects, Lewis and Janda (2) report that males who coslept with their parents between birth and five years of age had significantly higher self-esteem, experienced less guilt and anxiety, and reported greater frequency of sex. Boys who coslept between 6 and 11 years of age also had higher self-esteem. For women, cosleeping during childhood was associated with less discomfort about physical contact and affection as adults. (While these traits may be confounded by parental attitudes, such findings are clearly inconsistent with the folk belief that cosleeping has detrimental long-term effects on psycho-social development.
* Crawford (3) found that women who coslept as children had higher self esteem than those who did not. Indeed, cosleeping appears to promote confidence, self-esteem, and intimacy, possibly by reflecting an attitude of parental acceptance (Lewis and Janda 1988).
A study of parents of 86 children in clinics of pediatrics and child psychiatry (ages 2-13 years) on military bases (offspring of military personnel) revealed that cosleeping children received higher evaluations of their comportment from their teachers than did solitary sleeping children, and they were underrepresented in psychiatric populations compared with children who did not cosleep. The authors state: "Contrary to expectations, those children who had not had previous professional attention for emotional or behavioral problems coslept more frequently than did children who were known to have had psychiatric intervention, and lower parental ratings of adaptive functioning. The same finding occurred in a sample of boys one might consider "Oedipal victors" (e.g. 3 year old and older boys who sleep with their mothers in the absence of their fathers)--a finding which directly opposes traditional analytic thought" (4).
* Again, in England Heron (1) found that it was the solitary sleeping children who were harder to handle (as reported by their parents) and who dealt less well with stress, and who were rated as being more (not less) dependent on their parents than were the cosleepers!
* And in the largest and possible most systematic study to date, conducted on five different ethnic groups from both Chicago and New York involving over 1,400 subjects Mosenkis (5) found far more positive adult outcomes for individuals who coslept as a child, among almost all ethnic groups (African Americans and Puerto Ricans in New York, Puerto Ricans,, Dominicans, and Mexicans in Chicago ) than there were negative findings. An especially robust finding which cut across all the ethnic groups included in the study was that cosleepers exhibited a feeling of satisfaction with life,.

References 
1. Heron P. Nonreactive CO-sleeping and Child Behavior: Getting a Good Night's Sleep All Night Every Night. Masters Thesis, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom , 1994.
2. Crawford, M. Parenting practices in the Basque country: Implications of infant and childhood sleeping location for personality development. Ethos 1994, 22;1:42- 82.

3. Lewis RJ, LH Janda. The relationship between adult sexual adjustment and childhood experience regarding exposure to nudity, sleeping in the parental bed, and parental attitudes toward sexuality. Arch Sex Beh 1988; 17:349-363.. Crawford, M. Parenting practices in the Basque country: Implications of infant and childhood sleeping location for personality development.
4.. Forbes JF, Weiss DS, Folen RA. The CO-sleeping habits of military children. Military Medicine 1992; 157:196-200.
5. Mosenkis, J The Effects of Childhood Cosleeping On Later Life Development 1998.
Masters Thesis. University of Chicago. Department of Human Development
James McKenna

Epidural

Another HUGE topic of controversy! 
Let me set one thing straight...I am not trying to be a superhero. I am not a sadist. I am not expecting a purple heart for choosing to deliver without medicinal pain management.
I have opted to deliver without medicinal pain management for 1 reason...it is the SAFEST.
Here's the data broken down in the simplest of terms...


Epidurals may cause blood pressure to suddenly drop which can prevent adequate blood flow to the baby.


May cause a severe headache caused by leakage of spinal fluid. 


After epidural is placed, you will need to alternate from lying on one side to the other in bed and have continuous monitoring for changes in fetal heart rate. Lying in one position can sometimes cause labor to slow down or stop.


Side effects: shivering, ringing of the ears, backache, soreness where the needle is inserted, nausea, or difficulty urinating


Epidural makes pushing more difficult and additional interventions such as Pitocin, forceps, vacuum extraction or cesarean may become necessary.


For a few hours after birth the lower half of your body may feel numb which will require you to walk with assistance


In rare instances, permanent nerve damage may result in the area where the catheter was inserted.


Though research is somewhat ambiguous, most studies suggest some babies will have trouble "latching on" which can lead to breastfeeding difficulties. Other studies suggest that the baby may experience respiratory depression, fetal malpositioning; and an increase in fetal heart rate variability, which may increase the need for forceps, vacuum, cesarean deliveries and episiotomies.


Now, let's look at the benefits of an epidural..


Allows rest if labor is prolonged. (my comfort)


Relieving the discomfort of childbirth can help some woman have a more positive birth experience (my comfort)


Most of the time an epidural will allow you to remain alert and be an active participant in your birth. 


If you deliver by cesarean, an epidural anesthesia will allow you to stay awake and also provide effective pain relief during recovery.


When other types of coping mechanisms are not helping any longer, an epidural may be what you need to move through exhaustion, irritability, and fatigue. (my comfort)


An epidural may allow you to rest, relax, get focused and give you the strength to move forward as an active participant in your birth experience. (my comfort)


Labor & delivery hurts. Complications arise. I understand this. However, my plan is to embrace the experience and do my very best, with my husband (and greatest supporter) by my side to deliver this baby naturally. My comfort pales in comparison to the risks mentioned above. (Recap: inadequate blood flow to the baby, slowing down labor, inability to push leading to forecep/vacuum/c-section or Pitocin intervention, respiratory depression, fetal heart rate variability, permanent nerve damage)


Reference
http://www.americanpregnancy.org/labornbirth/epidural.html

Delayed Cord Clamping

We have opted to delay cord clamping upon the birth of our child. Usually, traditional doctors will clamp the umbilical cord within the first 30 seconds of delivery, merely for convenience and time management.
However, there are many benefits associated with delaying cord clamping until the cord stops pulsing (usually only about 7 minutes)
Some of the benefits are...

Umbilical cord blood is full of valuable T-cells that have cancer fighting properties.


So as long as the cord is unclamped, the average transfusion to the newborn is equivalent to 21% of the neonate's final blood volume and three quarters of the transfusion occurs in the first minute after birth. (Science Daily)


Whenever a pulsating umbilical cord is clamped,  20-60% of the baby's total blood volume is trapped inside the placenta.  A 9 pound baby manufactures only 10 ounces of blood during gestation.  It will take over 6 months for the baby to replenish the volume of blood lost by early cord clamping.In essence, newborns become involuntary blood donors.  HALF their blood volume is lost when their cords are early clamped. This decrease in necessary blood volume causes the babies to become anemic.   In most cases, the anemia is not diagnosed and the infant is sent home in a weakened state, more susceptible to a host of complications, including SIDS.
Restricted umbilical cord problems associated with anemia are Autism, heart perforations, thyroid disorders, brain tumors, leukemia, hormonal imbalances and liver/kidney disease. (1)


The USF review is published in a recent issue of the Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine (14:3).
"Several clinical studies have shown that delaying clamping the umbilical cord not only allows more blood to be transferred but helps prevent 
anemia as well," said the paper's lead author Dr. Paul Sanberg, director of the Center. "Cord blood also contains many valuable stem cells, making this transfer of stem cells a process that might be considered 'the original stem cell transplant'." 


1.References
http://www.givingbirthnaturally.com/


Rabe H, Reynolds G, Diaz-Rosello J.  Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping in pre-term infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD003248.


Wadrop CA, Holland BM. The roles and vital importance of placental blood to the newborn infant. J Perinat Med, 1995;23(1-2):139-43.


Simon N, Morley GM.  Brainstem lesions in autism: birth asphyxia and ischemia as causative factors. International Meeting for Autism Research. November 1, 2004, Available online at www.cordclamping.com/IMFAR/IMFARpaper.htm

Gunther M. The transfer of blood between baby and placenta in the minutes after birth. Lancet, 1957 Jun 22;272(6982):1277-80.

Peltonen T. Placental transfusion: advantage and disadvantage. Eur J Pediatrics 1981 Oct;137(2):141-6.

Thursday, November 4, 2010

Hepatitis B

Why does my baby need a vaccine to prevent a sexually transmitted disease?
"This disease is virtually unheard of during infancy or childhood (unless an infected mother passes it along to her newborn baby during the birth process, a situation that is preventable with proper screening and treatment).
Also given the fact that the vaccine can cause fever, lethargy, poor feeding, and irritability in infants (according to the vaccine's product insert), making them appear to have caught a severe bacterial infection that requires IV antibiotics and invasive testing (when all it really is is a vaccine reaction), (Dr. Sears)" I really do not see any just cause for this vaccine!


Furthermore...

This was Ian Gromowski at birth

This was Ian within HOURS of receiving the Hep B vaccine

This was Ian 9 days after vaccination
Read more about Ian here Ian's Voice

The product insert for the Hepatitis B vaccine states that "severe problems are extremely rare." While we understand that Ian's case IS extremely rare, it is NOT a chance that we are willing to take! ESPECIALLY for a vaccine that is meant to prevent a disease that the baby can only contract through unprotected sex, shared needles, tattoos or blood transfusions with untested blood!

MMR

I would have to say that the MMR vaccine is the most "controversial" topic that we have researched & discussed with people. And here is the synopsis of what we have learned, by way of MYTH vs. TRUTH.
MYTH: "Dr. Andrew Wakefield's 1998 study linking autism & MMR was discredited because there is no found associative link"
TRUTH: Dr. Wakefield's study was put under scrutiny based on his data collection methods not the correlation that was found in 170 cases of autism with the MMR vaccine. Furthermore, contrary to what the mainstream media will tell you,  there ARE a number of other studies that replicate his findings (Here are the first 28 of them:The Journal of Pediatrics November 1999; 135(5):559-63The Journal of Pediatrics 2000; 138(3): 366-372Journal of Clinical Immunology November 2003; 23(6): 504-517Journal of Neuroimmunology 2005  , Brain, Behavior and Immunity 1993; 7: 97-103Pediatric Neurology 2003; 28(4): 1-3Neuropsychobiology 2005; 51:77-85The Journal of Pediatrics May 2005;146(5):605-10 , Autism Insights 2009; 1: 1-11Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology February 2009; 23(2): 95-98Annals of Clinical Psychiatry 2009:21(3): 148-161Journal of Child Neurology June 29, 2009; 000:1-6 , Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders March 2009;39(3):405-13 , Medical Hypotheses August 1998;51:133-144., Journal of Child Neurology July 2000; ;15(7):429-35Lancet. 1972;2:883–884., Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia January-March 1971;1:48-62Journal of Pediatrics March 2001;138:366-372. , Molecular Psychiatry 2002;7:375-382. , American Journal of Gastroenterolgy April 2004;598-605., Journal of Clinical Immunology November 2003;23:504-517., Neuroimmunology April 2006;173(1-2):126-34., Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol Biol. Psychiatry December 30 2006;30:1472-1477.Clinical Infectious Diseases September 1 2002;35(Suppl 1):S6-S16 , Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004;70(11):6459-6465 , Journal of Medical Microbiology October 2005;54:987-991Archivos venezolanos de puericultura y pediatrĂ­a 2006; Vol 69 (1): 19-25., Gastroenterology. 2005:128 (Suppl 2);Abstract-303)
MYTH: Measels, Mumps & Rubella are fatal diseases.
TRUTH: Measels (fever, cough, sneezing, sore throat, rash) usually runs it's course in about 10 days. If left UNTREATED, complications may follow, as with any illness. In extremely rare cases, complications may lead to more severe illness or extremely rare fatality. The TREATMENT??? VITAMIN A!!! 
Mumps (swollen glands, headache, fever, chills) runs it's course in about 14 days. TREATMENT??? BEDREST!!! 
Rubella (fever, headache, Bruising (rare), Inflammation of the eyes (bloodshot eyes), Muscle or joint pain) Generally runs it's course in 3 days.TREATMENT? TYLENOL


According to the Centers for Disease Control's Information Statement:




Measles 
Causes rash, cough, runny nose, eye irritation, fever. 
Can lead to ear infection, pneumonia, seizures, brain damage, and death.





Mumps 


Causes fever, headache, swollen glands. 


Can lead to deafness, meningitis (infection of the brain 


and spinal cord covering), infection of the pancreas, 


painful swelling of the testicles or ovaries, and, rarely, 
death.
*****The CDC claims the mumps vaccine is 76 to 95 percent effective, but they offer no scientific evidence whatsoever to support that claim. To date, there has never been a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study published on the mumps vaccine in humans. -Natural News








There is a big difference between CAUSES and CAN LEAD TO. Many illnesses CAN LEAD TO a number of additional damages, including death. The common cold CAN LEAD TO death!!! The CDC's own statements show us that we have to be diligent in our research AND in how the information is presented to us!

***Now, for the sake of arguement...let's look at the side effects (ie: Symptoms) that may occur due to the MMR vaccine: Fever (1 in 6 people who receive the vaccine), rash (1 in 20), swollen glands, seizures (1 in 3,000), pain & stiffness in joints (1 in 4), low platelet count which can lead to bleeding disorder (1 in 300,000), deafness, permanent brain damage, coma, lowered consciousness.


***ALSO, YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT THIS INFORMATION IS ON THE MMR VACCINE PRODUCT INFORMATION SHEET...Did your doctor share this with you???



ARGUMENT: Everyone has a moral obligation to vaccinate their child from these diseases. Otherwise, we will have another epidemic.
OUR OPINION: We are advocates of the "betterment of society" and would certainly not do anything that puts other people at risk. However, there are other ways to immunize a child, without using pharmaceuticals. Breast feeding & delayed cord clamping are just two of the ways to help immunize a child naturally. Also, as stated above, none of the aforementioned diseases (measles, mumps, rubella) are fatal!
TRUTH: One recent outbreak of mumps in Ocean County found that  "77 percent of the patients with mumps had been vaccinated for the disease as a child" - Ocean County Health Department

And don't forget...from a previous post...





This Doctor's study is about to change EVERYTHING!!!
Already, cases being presented in the Federal Vaccine Court are WINNING! In other words, the government is FINALLY admitting that YES, PERMANENT DAMAGE IS CAUSED BY CERTAIN VACCINES!!!


Why this blog has been created...

First and foremost, this is a journey that we have elected to embark on based on our own personal beliefs. We do not judge anyone else's decision-making process, nor do we believe that we are "right" and someone else is "wrong."
We had to use the process of in vitro fertilization in order to become pregnant. In vitro is not only painful, expensive & carries potential risks, but it is still somewhat stigmatized. We researched and weighed the benefits versus the risks when contemplating that procedure...why would we stop there?
We both walk the line between Eastern and Western medicine's schools of thought. We believe in chiropractic care, herbal remedies & wellness practices over the idea of vaccines and unnecessary surgeries.
Before we make ANY decisions regarding our personal care, or the care of our unborn baby, we obtain as much information as possible from empirically based, valid & reliable sources. Throughout this blog we will share some of the knowledge that we have obtained.
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. We are not the type of people who take a recommendation and trust it without looking at a number of possibilities. In MANY cases, the doctors will not share vaccine product inserts or alternative treatments with you! This is important information that we need to find ON OUR OWN! Sadly, many people do not. We live in a society where we are taught to "do as they say" without question. We also put blind faith in doctors and health care providers rather than take the responsibility upon ourselves. Just because they have a degree that you don't have, doesn't mean that they know EVERYTHING! I have personally shared information with my doctor that he wasn't aware of! There is a sea of information out there!!!
Thanks for experiencing our journey with us and we hope we can help to inspire & educate you!